MERLE E. CURTI: AMERICAN SOCIAL HISTORIAN 1897-1966
by
Allen F. Davis,
Professor of History
and Director of Public History, Temple University
Merle
Curti in 1987. Courtesy of the University of Wisconsin -
Madison.
Merle E. Curti, a pioneer in the
development of intellectual history and one of the founders of
the American Studies Association, died March 9, 1996 at the age
of ninety-eight. A transitional figure in American historiography,
Curti was one of Frederick Jackson Turner's last students and
a close friend of Charles Beard. His own students included Richard
Hofstadter, John Higham, and Warren Susman. Born in Nebraska and
educated at Harvard, Curti taught at Beloit, Smith, Teacher's
College, Columbia, and from 1942 to 1968 at the University of
Wisconsin.
Each summer he returned to his
beloved, restored farmhouse in Lyme Center, New Hampshire. It
was here and at Baker Library at near-by Dartmouth College that
he did much of his writing. He also taught in Japan, Australia,
and India, and he lectured many times throughout Europe, where
his work is well known. Of all the honors bestowed upon him,
including many honorary degrees and the Pulitzer Prize, he was
perhaps most proud of the Order of the Northern Star awarded
him by the Swedish Government in 1965.
Curti was strongly influenced by
John Dewey's instrumentalism and that influence permeates The
Growth of American Thought (1943) and much of his other writing.
He traced the social history of ideas and the relationship of
ideas to society. The Growth may seem encyclopedic and
difficult to read today, but at the time it was published, along
with Ralph Gabriel's The Course of American Democratic Thought
(1940), it helped to establish intellectual history as a field
of study, and after the war it became an indispensable guide for
American Studies scholars. There is no "Curti School" of history.
His eighty-six Ph.D. students wrote on dozens of topics and he
never tried to enforce an interpretation or insist on a particular
approach. His own interests were eclectic and wide-ranging, and
his bibliographical knowledge in a dozen fields was legendary.
He wrote several
books on the peace movement, including Bryan and World Peace
(1931) and Peace or War: The American Struggle (1936),
and he helped to establish Peace Studies as a field of scholarship.
The American Peace Crusade (1929) was based on his dissertation,
written after Arthur Schlesinger Sr. (who had replaced Turner
at Harvard) rejected his first effort, which was apparently a
junior version of The Growth of American Thought. He wrote
on the history of education; in fact, The Social Ideas of American
Educators (1935) remains one of his most important books.
His history of the University of Wisconsin, done in 1949 with
Vernon Carstensen, is still one of the best college histories
ever written. He wrote on philanthropy. In addition to books on
American philanthropy abroad and philanthropy and higher education
his article: "American Philanthropy and the American Character,"
American Quarterly X (Winter, 1958): 420-437, is the best
place to begin to learn about a field that is just now attracting
American scholars.
Curti
not only wrote intellectual history, he also was one of the
leaders in attempting to apply social science methods to the
study of history. He chaired the Committee on Historiography
of the Social Science Research Council (that included among
others, Charles Beard, Thomas Cochran and Jeanette Nichols),
which produced the famous "Bulletin 54" Theory and Practice
in Historical Studies (1946). More important he tried to
apply social science methods and statistical analysis to the
study of Trempealeau County in Wisconsin. His book, The Making
of an American Community (1959), tried to test Turner's
theories about democracy, and it remains an important pioneer
work in social history.
Curti was the
co-author (with Willard Thorp and Carlos Baker) of a collection
of documents, American Issues (1950),the first such collection
in American Studies. He was also the co-author with Paul Todd
of a high school text, The Rise of the American Nation,
which is still in print and still being attacked in some circles
as too liberal. Curti was often attacked, especially in the 1950s,
for his liberalism, his relativism, and for his defense of unpopular
causes. He was always proud that in one such attack a right-wing
critic denounced the dangerous, radical ideas of "Beard, Becker,
and Curti." He thought he was in excellent company. He was not
afraid to speak out in defense of freedom of speech and to denounce
loyalty oaths, anti-intellectualism and McCarthyism, as he did
in his presidential addresses to the Mississippi Valley Historical
Association (1952) and the American Historical Association (1954).
Merle
Curti was a member of the First Unitarian Church of Madison,
Wisconsin, whose Meeting House was designed by Frank Lloyd
Wright.
Curti was not a dramatic lecturer,
nor a charismatic teacher. He influenced through his wide-ranging
mind, his vast knowledge, his varied and innovative scholarship
and his tolerance for all points of view. He offered sympathetic
support to hundreds of students and to a great many others who
demonstrated any intellectual curiosity about the human condition
and the American scene. In retirement he kept up a huge correspondence
with friends and former students, even with some scholars he
had never met. And he continued to read widely in the most recent
scholarship and the latest fiction. Even in the last few years
his letters to me praised or criticized books that I had never
heard of or had not got around to read.
Curti attended a series of luncheon
meetings in the Supreme Court Cafeteria in Washington in the
years after World War II that Carl Bode always maintained led
to the founding of the American Studies Association. He was
not of the Fellows in American Studies that Robert Spiller argued
was the founding organization, though he knew Spiller just as
he knew all the important Americanists in the post-war years.
He was vice-president of ASA in 1954-55, and he was asked to
serve as president the next year, but he declined because he
was going to be out of the country. He was not asked again,
but he took part in many American Studies conferences from Texas
to Cambridge, England to Hyderabad. In so many ways Merle Curti
was one of the important pioneers in establishing intellectual
history and American Studies as a way of learning and teaching
about American culture.
Courtesy of American
Studies Association ASA Newsletter, June 1996
SO
LONG, MAESTRO: A Portrait of Merle Curti
Merle
Curti by Hone
I called him the Maestro,
and Maestro he remained for fifty years. His intellectual,
social, and cultural interests were broad and far-reaching
and, aided by a phenomenal memory bank, his knowledge bordered
on the encyclopedic, not only in history but in the social
sciences, the humanities, and the arts. He managed somehow
to envelop all fields of knowledge under the umbrella of
history, an ability that sketched from his first published
essay in 1922, stressing the contributions of literature
to understanding history to his last work in 1980, Human
Nature in American Thought.
I suppose the Maestro's energy
and knowledge are best measured by his productive scholarshipsome
twenty scholarly books and at least fifty major essays.
on subjects ranging from the peace movement to philanthropy
abroad to dime novels to world's fairs, all within the context
of American history. This scholarship has already been judgedby
his Pulitzer Prize, the numerous awards of learned societies,
the presidencies of the major historical organizations,
the recognition of the distinguished visiting lectureships,
both here and abroad, and his many honorary degrees.
The major example, however,
and the central point of his career, was his pioneering
work in social and intellectual history, The Growth of
American Thought (1943), still in print after sixty
years, which he described as "a social history of American
thought." He received the Pulitzer Prize for this monumental
work that few have tried to duplicate and none with success.
His own earlier work all pointed toward this book, and all
his subsequent work was related to it. I am inclined to
think that no other single piece of writing in American
history, short of Turner's essay on the frontier, has stimulated
more varied and extensive scholarship.
The Maestro's work, it seems
to me, was greatly shaped and conditioned by a deep sense
of humanity and a profound respect for the individual human
being. And this is why, despite his occasional gloom about
the present prospects of humanity, his study and writing
reflected a conviction that, in the long run, the evil some
men do is outweighed by the good most people are capable
of in their daily lives.
In his writing and teaching,
the Maestro emphasized the greatness that resides in the
common body of humanity, and the common stuff of humanity
found in the truly great. This is why, I think, he was such
a passionate defender of academic freedom, a promoter of
social justice, and an active worker against racial and
sex discrimination, even at a time when the movement for
those civil rights still lay in the future.
Equally at ease in the presence
of prime ministers and New Hampshire farmers, as comfortable
on the boulevards of Paris as on the county roads of his
native Nebraska, as well-read in Ned Buntline as in Karl
Barth, Merle Curti was a true cosmopolitan in a manner beyond
the capacity of jet-setter or diplomat. As knowledgeable
in the arts as in the social sciences, as understanding
of science as he was of literature, he came as close to
possessing an all-embracing mind as is possible in the top-heavy
specialization of the twentieth century.
As scholar and teacher he
will live on for a very long timein the books, scholarly
articles, and essays he wrote and in the students he trained
who went on to train others in a continual passing on of
his legacy. But the Maestro as an individual human being,
a dear and close friend, will not survive those of us who
knew him personallyhis sweetness of character and
his gentleness of mannerand whose lives were somewhat
better for his presence than would otherwise have been the
case.
G. D. Lillibridge
Abridged from
THE AMERICAN SCHOLAR, Volume 66, Number 2, Spring 1997.
Copyright 1997 by the author. By permission of the publisher.