A Heimlich Maneuver for America

JACK MENDELSOHN

As a prophetic minister and author, Jack Mendelsohn’s interpretation of liberal religion has occurred largely as urban action while serving as pastor of the Arlington Street Church in Boston and the First Unitarian Church of Chicago. Among his books are Why I Am a Unitarian Universalist and Channing: The Reluctant Radical. He also helped to foster Henry Hampton’s production of the Pulitzer Prize winning national public television series, Eyes on the Prize.


This article is abridged from Speak Out Against the New Right edited by Herbert F. Vetter (Boston: Beacon Press, 1982)



The country is choking on a scam: the manipulation of politics by religious absolutists, and the manipulation of spiritual malaise by reactionary politicians. What is needed is a Heimlich Maneuver, an intervention in behalf of life. In the Heimlich Maneuver, someone with concern and skill extends prompt aid. Thought was required to learn how to do it. Will is required to do it. The aim is rescue. It is not just a mechanical procedure. It is a liberating act.

The Heimlich Maneuver is a metaphor of what religious liberals, in coalition with other caring religious bodies, must undertake. It is a metaphor of self-transcending energy, and of the respect all progressive and compassionate spiritual communities hold for the disciplines required to practice life-serving skills, and to exercise redemptive powers.

The immediate task is a realistic assessment of the threats religious chauvinists pose to the democratic process and to the struggle for social justice and peace. We must expose and oppose, but without making scapegoats of them for the miasmas on which they fasten and flourish. They prosper because they attack vulnerabilities in our political and religious perceptions. The need of the 1980s is for new creations of American political thought and theologies of politics. A cooperative, broadly ecumenical agenda is required. Many lively contributors are welcome.

The New Religious Right has brought multitudes of formerly apolitical, born-again Christians into the political arena. While we have reason for restrained joy, it is still true that democracy stands to gain when more citizens are involved. Whether religious convictions and politics should "mix" has never been the question. The nature of the mix has never been the question. The nature of the mix is the issue: what use of religious convictions resulting in what kind of politics?

For the 2,500 Christian Right leaders who assembled in Washington in January 1981 to celebrate Ronald Reagan's victory, the Bible and Christ are still "the place to be." But what an extraordinarily different place.

God, they exulted, is alive and rejoicing in an awakened Christian America about to smite—hip and thigh— abortion, liberalism, welfare, food stamps, affirmative action, sex education, the United Nations, aid to the third world. They even managed to round up a black clergyman who applauded the slave trade. "The greatest thing God ever did for blacks in this country," he cried, "was to send some white men in ships to Africa and bring us back to this country so that we could know Jesus Christ." The overwhelmingly white audience gave him a standing ovation.

How can we take this seriously, while still retaining our sense of humor and purpose? We'd better. In one hundred and ninety days—from Inauguration to passage of the Reagan budget and tax cut—a new national administration and its Christian Right allies created a whopping reversal of direction for this country, threatening visions of America as an embodiment of a just and humane society.

The religious platoons of the Regressive Revolution, via the electronic church, have made, in the 1980s, a quantum leap beyond the past, both in reaching mass markets and in hugely successful fund-raising. A significant difference.

Someone has measured the total audience to which Jesus preached as no more than twenty or thirty thousand persons. Today's electronic preachers speak regularly to millions. Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, et al. are paragons of up-to-the-minute communications technique.

Why is so much of this effort politically right-wing? It is only fair to credit whatever heartfelt political convictions the electronic evangelists may have. It is also crucial to reckon with this country's "free enterprise" syndrome. The airwaves are open to those who can pay. Who can pay? Those who know how to appeal to a paying audience. The electronic evangelists have learned who is able and willing to supply cash!

Progressive and compassionate religious forces, like a silhouette painting, will begin to take new shape by what the rampant right in religion and politics is seemingly driven to do. It is critical, as we construct an activist interfaith agenda, that we will sanctify no self-serving pieties, no coarse manifestations of greed and privilege, no social amnesia in the name of personal salvation; that we will be defined by a sense of the holy that is genuinely liberating as well as commanding. There will be no play-acting, no mumbling by rote, no posturing. We will commit ourselves to what transcends ourselves, to what makes the whole world, not just our private corners of it, more fit for living. We will cleave to history's higher rather than its meaner meanings. We will act for the freedom and dignity of those to whom freedom and dignity are now a farce. Our disciplines will be humility and hope. Our faith will exalt love, justice and moral power, a marvelous mixture of openness and conviction.


Buy SPEAK OUT! at Amazon.com

Audio tapes of Cambridge Forum programs featuring many Speak Out! writers are available for online order.
For more information please visit the Cambridge Forum and the WGBH Forum Network online.



| TABLE OF CONTENTS |

 
 
Herbert F. Vetter, D.D., Director
hfvetter@post.harvard.edu
Chuck Howe, Designer
Andrew Drane, Webmaster
andrew@andrewdrane.com