Brethren and Friends,
In reply to your first memorial I am not conscious of having given occasion for the remarks and strictures in your second. Whatever may be the present difference between me and a part of my parishoners “in some important religious theories”, I am at a loss to conjecture on what ground you allege that “ this difference in a great degree is co-eval with my ordination in this Parish.” The Church and Society, with the knowledge of my religious principles, were remakably unanimous in inviting me to become their minister. It was this unanimity, which more clearly than anything else indicated to me my duty to accept the invitation. It was this, which encouraged me to undertake the difficult and laborious work of the ministry in this place; and the dictating to my hearers what they must believe. I merely present to them what I believe to be scriptural truths inculcating it upon them to search the scriptures for themselves; to compare what is preached with the word of God; and to be “ready to give an answer to everyone that asketh a reason” of their faith and hope. As this is the duty of every hearer, so it is the duty of every preacher of the word. “If any man speak, let him speak as the oracle of God” A minister of the gospel is solemnly bound to study the scriptures diligently, to expound them clearly, and to apply them faithfully “ commending himself to every man’s conscience in the sight of God. This has been, and by the grace of God shall be, my aim in this ministry. “The apostolic precept is binding upon me and upon every minister of Christ.” “Take heed to thyself and to thy doctrine, continue in them; for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself and them that hear thee.” By any other course I could not reasonable expect to save either. As therefore I regard your salvation or my own, I must observe this precept. “Necessity is laid upn me, yea, woe is unto me”, if I preach not the gospel,”according to my understanding of it,” and of “the ability which God giveth.” Nor does my responsibility stop here. It extends to the ministration performed in my place, through my voluntary agency.
Believing therefore, as I do believe, that neither the unity and peace, no the moral and religious interests of the Church and Society, would be promoted by the proposed diversity of preaching, but, on the contrary, the most unhappy division, and the most injurious effects, to the present, and probably to future generations, I cannot either as your minister or as your friend, be accessory to it. As far as it is inconsistent with “ holding faith and a good conscience,” I would “become all things to all men, that I may by all means save some.” If I seem to disregard the wishes, or the taste, of my hearers, it is because I am more desirous to save , than to please them. Nor can I ever forget the solemn declaration of an apostle — indelibly impressed upon my mind in the text; and by the Discourse upon it, at my Ordination; “Now if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.”
Gratefully remembering the assurance you have given me, that you “should be most unwilling to interfere with my conviction of duty,” I persuade myself that, on mature reflection, you will ask of me no greater pledge, than that which I gave to this church and People when they were committed to my pastoral care. This I am ready to renew, as, in the presence of God, to whom I must soon “give an account of my ministry.”
Commending you to God, and to the word of his grace, which is able to build you up, and praying that we may mutually “endeavour to keep the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace,”I am,
Bretheren and Friends,
Your friend and servant in the gospel,
A. Holmes
Cambridge, 17, Nov. 1827
[ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ] [ 9 ] [ 10 ] [ 11 ] [ 12 ] [ 13 ] [ 14 ]
Cambridge, Massachusetts