a digital library of Unitarian Universalist biographies, history, books, and media
the digital library of Unitarian Universalism
Home » Biographies » Charles Hartshorne: Indeterminism

Charles Hartshorne: Indeterminism

Process and Reality Cover

Whitehead’s philosophy
continued to influence

Hartshorne’s metaphysical position is indeterministic, psychicalist, and theistic. The most pervasive fact of experience, according to Hartshorne, is creativity, the becoming of novel actualities. Whitehead said in Process and Reality that the “many become one and are increased by one.” Hartshorne expresses the same idea by saying that “to be is to create.” The extent of novelty is a matter of degree, ranging from a minimum in the nearly exact repetition of pattern at the inorganic level to the maximum in artistic creation at the human level. Of course, experience is also marked by law-like regularities, and science is largely occupied in discovering “laws of nature.” Hartshorne insists, however, that the determinist’s view that sufficient causal conditions can, in principle, be found for every event is not warranted by experience. The regularities perceived are never so exact as to eliminate novelty. Causes provide the necessary, not the sufficient, conditions for the emergence of new actual entities. When causes severely limit the possible range of effects, one finds the stability of order that is reflected in the laws of nature.

Indeterminism can, thus, account for nature’s regularities, whereas determinism cannot account for its novelty. This point is often missed, because indeterminism is mistakenly identified with the view that events are never causally conditioned. Hartshorne argues that the becoming of an actual entity is always causally conditioned, but that causes never guarantee every detail of their effects. Therefore, an effect is always “more than” its causes; the surplus is the measure of novelty in the world. Perfect knowledge would allow one to deduce causes from an effect, but no amount of knowledge would allow one to deduce an effect from its causes. It is not simply a limitation of knowledge that prevents one from predicting a poet’s next poem: such a prediction would amount to composing the poem oneself.


Series Navigation<< Charles Hartshorne: The Austin YearsCharles Hartshorne: Psychicalism >>
Tagged with:
Categories: Biographies, Theology & Philosophy

Notable in UU History
Edward Everett Hale

Edward Everett Hale (1822-1909)

No one who ever saw Edward Everett Hale could possibly forget him. No one who knew ... Read More
Lidian Emerson with their second son, Edward, who became a writer and editor like his father. Courtesy of the Concord Free Public Library.

Emerson’s Second Marriage and Family

The Living Legacy of Ralph Waldo Emerson In 1834, Emerson’s travels on the lecture circuit took ... Read More
Duncan Littlefair

Duncan Littlefair: A Unitarian Preaching Naturalistic Religion, 1912-2004

"I have come to think of all individuals as temporal, temporary, conscious intrusions or extrusions, or ... Read More
Benjamin Schwartz

Benjamin Schwartz

Born in East Boston to an immigrant family, Benjamin Schwartz was educated at Boston Latin School ... Read More